• What is This Blog?

benjaminwhittaker

benjaminwhittaker

Tag Archives: Jessica Chastain

The Martian

02 Friday Oct 2015

Posted by Ben Whittaker in Movie Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cinema, Film, Jessica Chastain, Kate Mara, Kristen Wiig, Mark Watney, Mars, Matt Damon, Michael Pena, Movie Review, NASA, Ridley Scott, Sean Bean, Space, The Martian, Water on Mars

img_4170

via denofgeek.com

“The Martian” is a confused and ultimately mediocre film. Whilst it isn’t ‘bad’ by any stretch of the imagination, it never manages to elevate itself above being an average film with a good premise, to a great movie that goes above and beyond its initial idea.

The film is about Mark Watney (Matt Damon), an astronaut left stranded on Mars after he’s hit by debris during a serious storm. His team left him behind because they presumed that he was dead, given that he wasn’t responding to their calls and his body wasn’t visible in the darkness of the storm. After waking up alone and assessing the situation, Watney comes up with a plan to make life sustainable on the alien planet, using his botanist skills to create an artificial habitat in which to grow plant life. The film focuses on Watney as he attempts to make the best of his situation, but when he isn’t on screen we watch NASA as they do what they can to rescue him.

img_4168

via foxmovies.com

The most surprising thing about “The Martian” is its sense of humour. The film constantly uses comedy to create a connection between the audience and Watney, and whilst the jokes do hit every now and again, the comedy meant that the tone was unclear and left Damon a bit short. Damon played a man staying positive in the face of adversity, so he made light of the crazy situation he was in, but that shouldn’t have been his entire character. It would’ve been possible to keep some of the jokes (which got old by the end) whilst also giving Damon the chance to portray the darker side of Watney’s isolation. He didn’t have any direct human contact for a substantial period of time, so I would’ve liked to see how this changed his personality, no matter how jovial a person he may have been before.

The personality that Watney was afforded was most often portrayed through the use of a video log, which Watney used to keep track of his day-to-day life on Mars. This video diary made the audience chuckle, as Watney said such lines as – ‘I’m going to have to science the shit out of this’ – but it was also painfully obvious that its place in the film was to provide exposition.

The video diary was used to inform the audience of many things, including Watney’s profession and the way that water can be artificially created; this was an intelligent way to put across important information, but when you realise what’s happening the diaries become quite annoying. I would’ve preferred if the film went one way or the other, putting across information subtly through items just in shot, or having Watney break the fourth wall and telling the audience everything directly. Either of these methods would’ve been less jarring than the use of the video diaries, and the latter would’ve still allowed for comedic moments.

img_4171

via gamezone.com

Whilst Damon was decent in the film and had a lot of screen time, the ensemble cast wasn’t properly utilised in my opinion. Sean Bean had no place in the film and Kate Mara was completely wasted as her character was underdeveloped. Furthermore, in a film so focused on making its audience laugh, Kristen Wiig was pushed into the background, not once delivering a funny line. She’s one of the best comedy actresses in the world yet she never got the chance to show it.

I can’t help but feel like these small roles were meant for lesser-known actors who could adequately deliver their lines and then back off, so I have to wonder why Kristen Wiig, Kate Mara, Sean Bean, Michael Peña, and Jessica Chastain were cast at all. Rather than enhancing the quality of the film, their presence distracted me, given that they weren’t fully-formed characters and they are so recognisable. I feel like these great actors wanted to work with Ridley Scott, so they turned up on set for a few quick days of filming.

Overall, “The Martian” is an okay film, but it never quite reaches the level of quality that it aspires to. Ridley Scott is capable of making a spectacular movie, and the cast is amazing on paper, but sadly the end product just doesn’t make the grade. It drags on quite a bit and to say that Watney is on a volatile planet not congenial to human survival, he really doesn’t struggle as much as he should. Maybe he’s just that smart, but we have no idea what his background is or what his specific role was on the mission, so we can’t make that assessment. “The Martian” isn’t terrible, but there’s nothing particularly special about it, and I certainly wouldn’t recommend it.

6/10

A Most Violent Year

23 Monday Mar 2015

Posted by Ben Whittaker in Movie Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1981, A Most Violent Year, Abel Morales, Cinema, Ex Machina, Film, Gangster, Gangster Movies, Goodfellas, Interstellar, Jessica Chastain, Movie Review, New York City, Oscar Isaac, The Godfather, The Sopranos

A Most Violent Year

“A Most Violent Year” echoes some of our most beloved gangster movies in tone and aesthetics, with leading man Oscar Isaac looking as suave and self-assured as any made man. However, this isn’t so much a gangster movie as it is a movie about not wanting to be a gangster. Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac) just wants to run an honest business and better himself, in spite of the fact that he’s married a mobster’s daughter and is under investigation from the police, but no matter how hard he tries he simply cannot change the world around him. This is a film about adapting to dangerous surroundings in order to survive and thrive, and it succeeds on many levels, particularly in making its morally grey characters both likeable and entertaining.

The movie is about Morales, and his struggle to run a successful oil business in a crime ridden New York City. Along the way we see him attempt to balance the various issues in his life, as he does his utmost to be a loving husband whilst facing a precarious criminal investigation, and faces a power struggle against his dangerous competitors whilst trying to secure funding for his latest business expansion. Meanwhile, his workers are afraid to work, because they are assaulted regularly during their deliveries, and it’s Morales’ job to convince them to carry on doing what they are paid to do in the right way, despite the fact that they could potentially be putting their lives on the line.

hero_AMostViolentYear-2014-1.jpeg

via rogerebert.com

The title refers to New York City in 1981, as the year was statistically an extremely violent one in that particular setting’s history. The themes of violence and danger are clearly evident in “A Most Violent Year”, which reaffirms the idea that no one in this place is truly safe. There’s a constant sense of foreboding as the movie progresses, which is mainly down to the bleak colour palette on display throughout, so you’re always waiting for something despicable to happen.

The thing that I was most impressed with in this movie was the intelligent decisions that were constantly being made. For example, there were many scenes in which a radio was playing in the background, usually as Morales was facing a difficult situation or struggling to cope with his dire circumstances, and if you listen carefully enough you will notice that the speaker was always telling a story of an unfortunate person that had been robbed, injured, or worse. Little details like this really make me feel excited by a film, and make me want to give it the time of day.

A-Most-Violent-Year-1.jpg

via filmtakeout.com

However, this also leads into the most problematic aspect of “A Most Violent Year”, because the quality of the filmmaking falsely led me to believe that there was a bit more going on. I was always waiting for a twist, for something to change the film and make it all come together, but sadly the movie played the same note over and over and this became slightly dull by the end. I really liked this film, and it showcased a lot of potential, but it constantly simmers and never reaches the boil. Morales needed to be more than he was, he needed a compelling arc through the course of the movie, a significant change, but he didn’t develop enough for me. He couldn’t became the villain and become something more than he was when the film began, but sadly he was a little too ordinary for my liking.

The performances were all very good, and they made the movie what it was, but ‘good’ really is the key word. The performances, just like the film itself, were acceptable and enjoyable, but they didn’t push to that level of quality that they clearly could’ve done. Oscar Isaac was great, as he often is, giving his character real life and portraying Morales’ conflicting emotions brilliantly. Morales as a character was obsessed with being the best he could be and making an honest man of himself, but he knew that to do the former he might have to sacrifice the latter. The virtue of having Oscar Isaac as your leading man is that he can demonstrate this internal struggle thoughtfully and carefully, without the need for overly simplistic dialogue.

a_most_violent_year.jpg

via filmblog.damaris.org

Jessica Chastain is back to her best, following what I considered to be a poor performance in “Interstellar”. I’ve never really seen her as this type of character before, because usually she plays a moral and likeable character, so it was interesting to see whether or not she could pull it off. In this film she plays Anna Morales, a powerful and confident woman, and she does so in an incredibly convincing manner. She’s fast talking, sharp, and she really is the woman behind the man.

She’s a gangster’s daughter at heart; she wants what she wants and she’s used to getting it, which makes her dynamic with Abel all the more interesting, because he’s unwilling to go against his values when making headway in his profession, and she sees this nobility as a sign of weakness. This leads to conflict between the two and a great deal of frustration on both sides, but what makes Chastain’s performance noteworthy is that despite her evident annoyance, her love for Abel is still at the forefront and there for all to see. That could’ve easily been lost if the part had been played by a less capable actress, but due to Chastain’s intelligence and her chemistry with Isaac, their relationship remained endearing throughout the film.

If I ask you to think of great cinema and television with this kind of tone, you might suggest such pieces as “Goodfellas”, “The Godfather” and “The Sopranos”, and I think you’d be right to make those comparisons. This film certainly seems to take some kind of inspiration from those works of art, and as you watch you can’t help but think of just how fantastic both of these actors would’ve been in those titles.

a-most-violent-year

via indiewire.com

The characters were interesting because they were constantly scheming and driven by their own personal needs. Morales was desperate to be a perfect man with a credible business, and yet there was still something incredibly crooked about him. His drive and his passion felt feral and vicious, which never really sat right with me. He sought to be good, there’s no doubt about that, and he acted on that for the majority of the film, but what he really wanted, the feeling bubbling inside of him, that’s anyone’s guess. What I took from the film was that Morales was more of a monster than he ever let on, and that given the right kind of push he would’ve snapped and bit back at all those who’d harmed him. His ideals were present and pushed to the forefront, but I felt that they were covering the sinister side of his personality, and that what he wanted to be was more of an idea than the reality.

Despite the fact that I enjoyed this film, I felt that we weren’t told everything that we should’ve been in order to fully grasp the story. I think that this was intentional at certain points, because we weren’t meant to know who was stealing Morales’ oil, and perhaps we didn’t need to. However, I feel that we really could’ve done with more context on who Abel was, because we never got to know of his background, which meant that we didn’t know why he held such passionate views. We also could’ve done with more information about Anna’s father and her past, because that’s where the real interest in the story was; we knew that these things were impacting on what we were watching, but what we wanted to know was what exactly happened to get these people to the point at which they were at. I feel these stories would’ve been more interesting than the one I paid to see.

The film ended in a slightly abrupt and anti-climactic manner, but I enjoyed it for what it was worth. The story was concluded in a satisfying way, because the main aspects of the narrative were resolved, and the way that Abel and Anna’s life would continue was clear enough. Every now and again that kind of cut-off is refreshing, because there’s something extremely comforting in knowing that nothing is left hanging in the balance when you’ve been watching a film for the best part of two hours.

gallery_movies-a-most-violent-year-still-2

via digitalspyuk.cdnds.net

The ending had a fair bit of symbolism on display, or at least I took that from it. Blood was spilt and oil was spilt, which I feel represented the business that Abel was in, as well as his practices. As I’ve said, he tried to be the best man that he could be, and in doing so I do believe that he was keen to do the right thing, but he wasn’t interested in whether or not he was facilitating the growth of others. He didn’t particularly want to hurt anyone on his road to success, but he wasn’t going to pull anyone out of the firing line either. He caused damage to others because of the messy business he was in, and the fact that his victory came at the expense of an innocent man was fitting for the nature of the man that this film was studying.

One of the last lines said in this film comes as Abel explains that he’s always attempting to take ‘the path that is most right‘, which I felt was a very clever choice of words. As a character Abel would never claim to be in the right, he would simply say things like ‘I run my business in a way aligned with normal business practices’; no claims are made about what these practices entail.

“A Most Violent Year” is a film that’s more about conversation and nuance than it is about actual violence, but that suits my tastes just fine. My biggest problem with the movie is that I left the theatre with the nagging sense that things could’ve been that bit more exciting if the writers had been slightly more ambitious with the story. Throughout the film I thought that things weren’t quite as they seemed, that the characters weren’t what they were pretending to be, and while that was true in a minimal sense for Abel, it was only every implicit. That’s fine and it’s impressive that Isaac’s performance was subtle enough to convey a conflict between Abel’s motives, his values and his true personality, but what I was waiting for was that one mind-blowing moment to make this film truly memorable and exceptional, which sadly never came. That doesn’t ruin the movie at all, and you can certainly draw your own conclusions and believe what you wish to about the future of the characters, but I think that a really explosive ending would’ve brought everything together and taken this film to a significantly higher level.

7/10

Interstellar

30 Sunday Nov 2014

Posted by Ben Whittaker in Movie Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anne Hathaway, Batman, Batman Begins, Christian Bale, Christopher Nolan, Cinema, Dallas Buyers Club, Film, Following, Gotham, Gravity, Guardians of the Galaxy, Hans Zimmer, Inception, Insomnia, Interstellar, Jessica Chastain, Mackenzie Foy, Man Of Steel, Matt Damon, Matthew McConaughey, Memento, Michael Caine, Movie Review, Space, Star Trek, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises, The Illusionist, The Prestige, True Detective

Interstellar

“Interstellar” is quite possibly Christopher Nolan’s worst movie, and yet within its three hour long run time it has some of the best moments of cinema I have ever seen. I’d been looking forward to this film for over a year, because like most people I’ve loved every Christopher Nolan movie I’ve seen (excluding “Man of Steel” because Nolan wasn’t directing, and “Following” because sadly I haven’t seen that movie).

For the first two and a half hours I was like a child staring in awe at the beautiful recreation of space Nolan had created, and preparing myself for a very positive review. “Interstellar” was a visual feast attacking my senses and filling my mind with ideas of time relativity and intergalactic travel, and I loved the moments which felt as though they were grounded in some form of reality, or based upon a strong scientific world-view. However, the ending completely ruined “Interstellar” for me, and has left me with an extremely bitter taste in my mouth.

I’m still disappointed that Nolan didn’t just cut the ending out, because to me it took the emotion from the rest of the film and threw it out of the window, with a laughable take on humanity’s place in this vast and powerful universe. There was a far better, more well-suited ending for the film, an ending which was in fact found within the movie itself. I believe that the last 20-30 minutes of this film could’ve easily been omitted, and there would’ve been a believable and worthy ending right there. If I ever watch “Interstellar” again I will know when to change the channel.

interstellar-2529854.jpg

via indiewire.com

The story in “Interstellar” is a bit wacky from the start, with no real explanation for why the earth has suddenly become inhabitable, and no background information on the characters. Nevertheless, the audience can buy into the world and support the premise, because on screen you have a blockbuster powerhouse known as Matthew McConaughey, who right now is one of the most popular and best actors around. You also have one of the most revered filmmakers in the world masterminding the film’s direction, and an all-star supporting cast including Anne Hathaway and Michael Caine, so it’s very easy to relax at the start when you have niggling suspicions that things aren’t going to be quite as amazing as you’d want them to be.

“Interstellar” revolves around Cooper (Matthew McConaughey), a wise-cracking farmer who has become dissatisfied with his mundane existence, attempting to survive in a world of dwindling resources and dying crops. His stock is slowly depleting due to the state of the world he finds himself in, and dust is infecting the lungs of the next generation, so that his children could be a part of the last generation on Earth. It isn’t the ideal existence, and it’s understandable that Cooper doesn’t feel that he has much purpose on Earth, because although his job is an important one given the dying planet, it is one which is ultimately futile. He has an obligation to his children to keep them safe, and clearly there is purpose there, but that overlaps with his goals for going into space to save humanity!

By staying with his children he would provide them with valuable emotional support, but by saving the planet he can give them a real future, a continued life on Earth or another viable planet. So you can understand why Cooper eventually goes into space. When he does, the film becomes incredibly interesting and entertaining, as Cooper and his companions travel through a wormhole in order to find a planet which could be congenial to human survival. They must make difficult decisions in order to save as much time as they can in space (given ideas of time presented in the film, which suggest that time can differ greatly in different regions of space – the group can spend one hour of their time on a certain planet, but this will cost them nine years back on Earth), so that Cooper can see his children again, and Amelia (Anne Hathaway) can see her father one more time before he dies.

interstellar-ted-2-fondamentalista-riluttante-film-in-tv-speciale-v4-32358-1280x16

via images.everyeye.it

Parts of the movie were fascinating and warranted further explanation. (SPOILER ALERT) For example, a crucial plot point in the film is that there are twelve explorers who have ventured through the wormhole, potentially giving their lives, to find a planet which could facilitate human life. This drives the film, as Cooper and his crew attempt to follow the remaining signals which are still being sent by the explorers, in order to discover the best possible world and begin work on a colony on that planet.

The exploits of these explorers are potentially more exciting than Cooper’s struggle to save his children, and could provide just as much of an emotional punch, as each of these brave astronauts presumably gave up their futures to save the rest of the world, leaving their families and friends behind. The moments when the group explore these planets are where this movie really shines, and more time should’ve been spent on developing the planets and the characters on them. I would’ve liked to know more of Miller, who was never found on the first planet visited, and even Mann (Matt Damon) could’ve done with a bit more time being developed as a real person, rather than just a character who was convenient for moving the plot forward.

The quiet moments in which the human passengers are at the mercy of space are thrilling, and they force you to think of the universe which is moving along right beside you, a world which you are in fact a part of. Watching how beautiful Nolan’s vision of space is really makes you think about how you view the real world, because we do forget that we are a part of such an amazing universe. Talk of wormholes, black holes and even other planets belong to science fiction, they are often used to tell stories of a grand nature like “Guardians of the Galaxy” and “Star Trek”, but they exist. They are here hurtling around the vast emptiness of space and so are we.

Interstellar-FLprStills30-e1421316356640-1600x1000.gif

via dneg.com

The realism Nolan brings with the special effects in this movie, and the emotional connection he creates between the characters, keep you grounded in the real world, but the story still feels as though it is as far from genuine possibility as anything could possibly be. You really feel that these people are at the mercy of something far greater than themselves, and you understand our own insignificance and lack of control over the larger forces in the universe. It is these moments where “Interstellar” is as beautiful and glorious a piece of cinema as anything I have ever seen.

The graphics in this movie were immaculate, and they added to a sense of realism which the emotion of the leading actors had already brought. It’s amazing to think that people actually created the world you were seeing around Cooper and Amelia. These character’s lives and the whole universe on display comes directly from the mind of Christopher Nolan, and that is truly incredible. Nolan can go from creating a bleak and sinister Gotham grounded in reality, and then take his audience into a fantastical dream world in “Inception”, or into space for “Insterstellar”. He deserves praise for both his ambition and his creativity, even though this film wasn’t quite as good as I had hoped.

There were some incredibly interesting and moving pieces of dialogue, for example, when Cooper explained to Murph (Mackenzie Foy) that when people become parents they become memories for their children, and his explanation that he couldn’t be that, that he was still his own man. It was a solemn way of declaring that he was effectively abandoning his child, but also a stunning way to explain that he knew his decision was at least in some sense wrong. Moments like this are when this movie is genuinely brilliant, and they reel the audience in at just the right time, as Cooper is about to venture into the unknown and risk his life for humanity. You become incredibly invested in the story and the characters, and this keeps you interested during scenes which could’ve seemed slightly ridiculous.

tenor.gif

via media.tenor.com

The performances were fantastic for the most part, and as usual McConaughey was brilliant. He portrayed a magnificent emotional performance, bringing some members of the audience to tears (including the person I went to the cinema with). He had great chemistry with Mackenzie Foy, and I really bought into their relationship in the early parts of the movie. Their last interaction was genuinely moving, even if it was seen on the trailer. McConaughey really showed the inner struggle of a character leaving his family behind, knowing he may never see them again, and his sacrifice for the good of humanity was utterly heroic. He brought a sense of understanding and understated sorrow to the role, and I am probably his biggest fan right now.

The supporting cast were impressive, but that was to be expected due to the calibre of actors in the roles. Anne Hathaway and Matt Damon stole a couple of scenes from McConaughey, and I enjoyed the movie the most when Damon was on screen. I am aware that his performance has been slightly polarising, but I really liked it. He showed some of the stupidity and insanity you’d expect from a man who had been alone on an alien planet, not knowing whether or not he would see another person ever again, and he was extremely weird at certain points, which I found quite entertaining.

Hans Zimmer’s score was tremendous as always, and it fit the film perfectly. It set the tempo for exciting scenes as the team explored the vastness of space, but the movie still knew when silence was key, for example, as doors opened to reveal the empty vacuum of space, and the sound emptied into that vacuum along with everything else. I’ve actually seen people say that the score was distracting or frustrating, but I just think those people weren’t buying into the wonder and beauty of it all, because the score fit that fantastically.

Interstellar-FLprStills31.gif

via dneg.com

I’ve also seen reviews that said that the film was too complicated, or that they didn’t understand some of the dialogue, but there isn’t a lot going on at all. You don’t have to be some sort of astrophysicist to understand the movie, you don’t even need a science GCSE, it’s all pretty simple. The only bits that don’t make sense are the parts towards the end which genuinely don’t have a place in the movie, and those scenes are needed for those people out there who are desperate for resolution in their films. It’s those kinds of people that force great directors like Nolan to make a conclusive ending to a film which never needed one, so if you are on that level please don’t complain about how complicated the story was (especially because it just wasn’t), because you ruin movies for the rest of us. I felt that things were actually over-explained to pander towards a larger audience; the concepts at play weren’t overly important, and everything the audience needed to know was repeated multiple times to reinforce the key ideas.

For a long period of the movie I thought that Nolan had pulled it off again, after blowing all other “Batman” films out of the water with his “Dark Knight Series”, he outdid “The Illusionist” with “The Prestige”, which was fantastic, and he made the amnesia storyline interesting with “Memento”. He’s a brilliant director and an all round genius, but he really jumped the shark with this one. He still destroyed “Gravity”, creating a greater spectacle and utilising a more ambitious story, but much like that film, its ending let it down. His vision was commendable for the majority of the movie, and I accept that he was trying to give a conclusion to a wacky and extremely challenging story, offering closure and performing a fan service. However, the ending was a catastrophe.

When the whole audience bursts into laughter towards the end of the movie you know that something has gone array, and I have to step in and say ‘why?’ Why would you shoot yourself in the foot by ending a three hour long, epic piece of cinema, with what was complete and utter garbage? Perhaps Nolan would say that we just don’t know what would happen in the scenario, and his interpretation of events is therefore as credible as anyone else’s, but I won’t buy that.

bH_wip_v3.jpg

via blenderartists.org

(SPOILER ALERT) The movie should’ve ended when Cooper went through the black hole, once more into the unknown, facing death with power and glory as Professor Brand (Michael Caine) kept telling us from the start! Instead Nolan attempted to explain what would happen if a person ventured into the darkness, into a place where no man has gone before, and it just didn’t work. I appreciate that he tried it, but you can’t just say ‘I want my story to have a happy ending, so I’m going to send my leading man to a place which no one knows anything about and let him sort things out. No one can tell me I’m wrong because no one knows what would happen’. That’s just a complete and utter cop-out!

SPOILER ALERT – The remainder of this review contains spoilers for key scenes in “Interstellar”.

The ending wasn’t just ridiculous, far-fetched and downright stupid, but it was also extremely strange. I could’ve just about accepted that Cooper could alter the past through a tesseract (a four-dimensional analogue of a cube) found in the centre of a black hole, solving all the world’s problems through the transcendent nature of gravity and love crossing all dimensions (yes that is the plot when you break it down!), if Cooper had then died. However, the fact that he survived that was a disgrace! As I’ve said many times about many different films, there are certain things you just can’t live through and carry on as normal, and this is definitely one of them!

This idiocy was then followed by a final reunion between Murph and Cooper. In this scene Murph was about to die at a very old age, and Cooper arrived just in time to say his goodbyes. But that was just cringe-worthy to the extreme, and both character’s reactions were completely out of step with their personalities as established in the rest of the movie. Neither character seemed to care all that much about their reunion, even though the whole film had played on the relationship between these two people, and we had seen on numerous occasions that the most important thing in Cooper’s life was Murph. This scene ruined the film for me even more so than the scene in which Cooper made his way into the black hole, because it destroyed the memory of the emotional scenes in the rest of the movie.

Interstellar-FLprStills02.gif

via dneg.com

The biggest problem with the ending of “Interstellar” was that nothing was explained. I’m still unclear about how Murph realised that the fact that her watch was broken meant that her father was sending her a message in Morse code from another dimension; are we seriously supposed to lay back and take it as Christopher Nolan attempts to force that down our throats? Sit down and ask yourself how this sounds now that I’ve articulated it properly, and ask if you can take yourself seriously if you actually enjoyed the last third of the movie.

The ending of a film is, in my opinion, the most important part, it validates the rest of the movie and is supposed to provide some sort of interesting closure to a story you have been emotionally invested in, not tarnish everything which comes before it. If you’re making a nice dinner for two hours, making sure that the flavours are balanced and each new ingredient works with the rest of the dish, but then spend the next hour slowly pouring an obscene amount of salt into the pot, it won’t be a nice dinner by the end of the three hours! So why doesn’t the same apply to a movie?

Once you’ve seen the ending of this film, you’ve pushed the detonator, and you begin to think of all the other plot holes the movie has. Each scene topples down from top to bottom, and suddenly you’re left with the memory of a far from perfect experience. The character behaviour in the movie is downright weird at times, and you start to question whether or not these characters are in any way believable. Professor Brand offers Cooper the chance to fly a spacecraft which he has been working on for a very long time, for a mission which will determine the future of the human race, even though he had no intention of offering the position to Cooper just hours before. This crucial mission was going to take place anyway without Cooper! Would a man put his life’s work in jeapordy like this because he knows what Cooper has done in the past? Wouldn’t he want to check that Cooper could still do the job?

Brand also sends his daughter (Amelia) into space, having lied to her about his life’s work, and withholding the fact that she will never see him again!

interstellar-2014-screenshot-michael-caine1

via threerowsback.files.wordpress.com

Cooper accepts the chance of going into space on a life-threatening journey, at the expense of a life with his children, even though he knows that his place on the shuttle isn’t integral to the mission, and he has a fine life back home. Yes the soil is becoming infertile and the world is dying, but he has a family that love him, and there’s every chance that the mission could succeed without him. I know he wants to explore and believes that the human race wasn’t meant to die on earth, but it’s clear that Cooper loves his family more than anything, and that is integral to the emotion which lies behind the scenes in space, so I don’t believe for a second that he would abandon them even if he did think he could save them.

Murph’s behaviour was also extremely odd, because although she would resent her dad for leaving her, of course she would, she had no right to hold it against him for decades! When Cooper is leaving she tries to reconcile with him unsuccessfully, just as he drives away into the dust-filled distance (which I will admit was heart-breaking). This suggests that she understood what her father was doing, so if I understand human behaviour in even the loosest of ways, I would expect that she would want to tell him this at the first given opportunity. Yet she refuses to communicate with her father when given the opportunity, she gives him the cold shoulder for trying to save the planet on which she still lives! I respect her frustration but that’s just downright irrational!

“Interstellar” is like a dysfunctional firework. It flies into the air with beauty and promise, exciting its audience with wonder and awe, and then at the last moment it crashes back down to earth in a blaze of shame and disillusion, exploding on impact, destroying the anticipation it had built and replacing it with anger and confusion. This film promises to be so much more than it actually is, but it never delivers. For a considerable chunk of its run time “Interstellar” deceives the audience with fantastic special effects and an ambitious story, but as the ending leaves you baffled and bemused, the dominoes start to fall. The characters don’t respond to their situations in believable and organic ways, and the story takes you to a ridiculous and nonsensical place. Overall this film is a mess trying to be an abstract work of art, and I will not buy into it.

5.5/10

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014

Categories

  • 1/10 Reviews
  • 10/10 Reviews
  • Features
  • Game of Thrones
  • Game Reviews
  • Movie Reviews
  • My Favourite Films of…
  • Television Reviews
  • The Oscars

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Cancel
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy